Type of project:  cultural facility 

Architecture studios: ALA Architects 

Main sponsor: City of Helsinki 

Year completed: 2018 

Materials: Wood, glass, concrete 

Total area: 17 100 m² 

Prizes:

• 2019 Public Library of the Year 
• Vuoden Teräsrakenne 2018 
• People’s Choice award AZ Awards 
• European Steel Design Award 
• Best in Heritage Project of Influence Award 2020
• Shortlisted for the EUmies Award 2019 

City / regional background

The project initially aimed to create a building that works as a city space in the heart of the urban landscape, characterised by its openness to the public, safety, and free admission for all. 

Oodi's strategic location across from the Eduskuntatalo (Parliament House) was purposefully selected as a symbol of the interconnection between government and the public. The chosen location positions the new library at the centre of the city’s cultural district, in proximity to various prominent institutions. 

Helsinki launched an architectural competition for the design of the future library, insisting on its sustainability and blending in the urban context. 

Solution

The name "Oodi" was chosen for to convey a sense of homage and tribute to the city and its residents. Translating as "Ode" the name reflects the library's role as a celebration of culture, knowledge, and democracy. 

The library structure is mainly composed of public areas, presenting an extensive selection of services. Visitors can engage in numerous activities and proactively pursue their interests. It serves as an ever-evolving platform for learning and personal growth for both residents of and visitors to Helsinki. 

The architectural layout divides the library's functions into three levels: a lively ground floor, a peaceful upper floor, and an enclosed in-between volume with multi-purpose functions. The design concept revolves around interlinking the three levels. The square in front of the building extends indoors through the glass façade and connects with the public spaces of the ground floor.  The third floor preserves the traditional library atmosphere and features a Citizens’ Balcony over the urban landscape. 

In between these two levels, the second floor is the most intimate space, placed inside a curved wooden mass. The mass has been vertically elongated, forging connections with the layers both above and below. 

Criteria for high-quality (context, sense of place, diversity, beauty)

• The competition rules placed a significant emphasis on ensuring the integration of the future building within the urban fabric (Töölönlahti urban bay area known for its cultural attractions, and recreational opportunities). 

• The building is nZEB (almost zero energy building according to the EU classification). During the construction process local materials were utilised and local climate conditions were kept in mind. 

• Service design principles were applied to enhance the customer experience, encompassing signage, furniture, and material arrangement. The library team continues to involve volunteers in planning new service concepts and layout changes.  

• To highlight their value of equality, Oodi has introduced gender-neutral toilets, which make their use easier for children and parents. 

Governance and management

While the Deputy Mayor for Culture and Leisure headed the main management team, several other management groups played a more hands-on role in the execution process. 

Presently, the library itself employs a staff of 64 members, yet numerous additional individuals, whether directly or indirectly, contribute to its continued operation. 

Budget and financing

Approximately EUR 93 million was allocated for the physical construction, with an additional estimated EUR 2 million designated for pre-construction planning, projects, and related expenses. The project's funding comprised 69% from the city of Helsinki and the remaining 31% sourced from Finnish national funds. 

Transferable ideas

• When setting the evaluation criteria for an architectural competition, put a significant emphasis on the effective harmonisation of the building with its location in the city, its usability, sustainability (energy efficiency), and practical feasibility besides architectural merits.  

• Incorporate residents’ ideas and feedback in the planning and design of the new building, for instance through urban events, workshops, online platforms, and campaigns. 

• Offer continuous development and modification of the services and design, for instance through participatory budgeting for pilot projects.